Monday, October 28, 2013

Google Closing Authorship Project?

AJ Kohn, someone who focuses more on authorship and rich snippets than most SEOs I know, wrote a story named Authorship Is Dead, Long Live Authorship.
In that story, he describes why he thinks the classic Authorship Project is slowing being closed down. In short, he thinks that because classic authorship is opt in, it isn't easy to scale at the size Google needs. So Google uses other methods to extract authorship/rich snippet like data from sources to show the richer data in the search results.
He also notes that Othar Hansson, who worked in the authorship side of search has left to work on Android in the past six months.
AJ wrote:
Authorship then becomes about Google's ability to extract entities from documents, matching those entities to a corpus that contains descriptors of that entity (i.e. – social profiles, official page(s), subjects) and then measuring the activity around that entity....
...The presence of Authorship markup might increase the confidence level of the match but it will likely play a supporting and refining role instead of the defining role in the process.

Penguin 2.1 Recovery Plans – Reclaim your rank now!!

Proven Six Step Penguin 2.1 Recovery Strategy

Google’s Penguin 2.1 has impacted a lot of websites as it has gone deeper to look for spam, analyzing internal pages as opposed to just the homepage of websites in the earlier Penguin 1.0 update . The problem being addressed here was unnatural, manipulative inbound link profiles. What makes a bad link profile?
Google focused on links that were from
• Automated link exchanges
• Low quality article submissions
• Artificial blog networks
• Fake Profiles
• Blog Comment Spam
• Site wide Link Spam (Header/Footer Link)
• Artificial Blogrolls
• Network websites
• Link Exchange Site (reciprocal sites)
• Malware Attacked sites
• Paid links and Link farms
• Adult websites
• Irrelevant websites
• Foreign language websites
• Domain expired sites